"jobs created" and generational theft - for lawyers
someone steals a $100 piece of junk from Walmart that has a 10%
profit mark up, that person has stolen $90 worth of material stock
and $10 of profit. To break even, Walmart now has to sell nine more
of that product to cover just the loss of the stock, with overhead
and such, it really is ten more items. So, for every item stolen, 10
more have to be sold to just break even on the stolen item. Those
costs (shrinkage in industry terms) are passed directly back to the
consumer in higher prices.
works the same way when you hear a Congress man such as Hank Johnson
(Democrat GA District 4 - Decatur - Stone Mountain ) or Obama brag
about all the jobs created, when they are jobs paid for by
taxpayers, so it is actually NEGATIVE job creation.
created a job using profits
someone begs me for a job and to work with me, and then I decide to
pay them out of my own profits and labor, even though I am dirt poor
myself, and to take my profit and give it to them instead, like I
did this summer, that is job creation. They did not have a job, so I
took my personal money, gave it to them to perform a task, so I
created a job. When I should have kept it for myself.
job growth results when jobs are paid for with taxes
a public employee (police officer as an example) is paid $50,000 a
year in wages and benefits, and you collect $2,000 in taxes from
each WORKING state resident, you have to collect taxes from twenty
five people to pay for that one job ($50,000 divided by $2,000 of
is negative job growth because if you created a job from business
profit instead, you would have added a tax payer to that pool of
state revenue for vital services. +1
you create a public service job, you actually remove twenty five tax
payers from that pool of state revenue for vital services. -25
you keep doing this, you run out of enough tax payers to support the
government jobs you have created. Sooner or later, you have more
Chiefs then Indians, so there is no one left to fight or earn, only
people to tell you what to do.
this happens you run a deficit. If you borrow money (from China) to
pay for the budget and then use the borrowed money (Stimulus) to
extend and create more public supported jobs, you have made the
you have not added a new tax payer to help pay for the BUDGET, you
have done worse, for every public employee added, you have taken 25
more tax payers from the existing pool, that pays for the government
you already have, that you already can not pay for.
you tax the people more that create jobs, so they have less money to
spend to create a job. Then unemployment rises because that rich
person you keep taxing more looks into their wallet and says "I
have to save money for my own family", I can get by doing more
is when unemployment really rises, because most of the jobs are
created by small businesses that can decide to not hire and can do
the work themselves or work longer hours unpaid. Or have their
children and relatives do the same. To then make it worse the
government creates more public jobs, removing even more tax payers
from the pool that pays in to support government. Business owners
see this, get more worried, and decide not to expand or compete
harder and to take risks, just to "hold the fort", this
creates even more job losses.
those "rich" folks, small business owners that make
$250,000+ a year, then decide they can get by without buying that
new car with cash, or that new boat, or that newly constructed
house. That maybe they should invest their money in inflation proof
things such as gold or to buy assets overseas where it will not be
taxed. So, all the poor people that might have created that car,
that boat, or washed it, or fixed it, are now out of jobs.
math for elected lawyers
has now created more Federal jobs then any other president in
history. I am going to round these figures out to make the math
million federal employees that make on average $75,000 a year =
divided by $5,000 worth of Federal income taxes means you removed
37,500,000 tax payers from the tax income pool. Or roughly 1/5 - 1/6
of the total.
it gets worse. Why? Because they used the "stimulus" funds
to prop up existing public jobs and worse to create new jobs at the
state and local city level. Using the "stimulus" funds
they were able to infect at the local level, the same thing killing
the country at the Federal level. QUISLINGS !
Thatcher, the former Prime Minister (president) of Britain (our home
country) said this "The problem with socialism is that you
eventually run out of other people's money. "
is why the government, running socialist programs coupled with
immoral and insane spending, has run out of money and why we are
borrowing money to prop up the government and selling our grand
children's future, for our own short term comfort.
leaving them a debt that can never be paid off, without God's
help. This is generational theft that the people that
founded our country warned against, directly.
when your local quisling brags about all the pork they have taken
home for you to eat, remember God's health laws to prevent you from
being poisoned within by not eating swine, and remember you are
leaving your unborn (if they are not aborted) grand children a debt
that can not be paid off. When you die and your children are sold
into virtual or real slavery, coupled with living the rest of their
lives at a lower standard of living that you enjoyed, they will have
you to thank for their misery.
when your local Census worker comes to your door, with hidden
homosexual messages in the "art work" (click
about how much you are sticking up your own kid's bum, by allowing
the government to waste your money and to borrow against God's good
instruction, because you are screwing them good.
the real question to ask yourself, are you going to be a incestuous
Sodomite and Quisling or are you going to turn back to God, the
Bible, and the Constitution, and fight for your children's future